April 12th, 2013
05:34 PM ET

Golf struggles to shed all-male image

Condoleezza Rice  id one of two female members at Augusta. (Getty Images).
Condoleezza Rice id one of two female members at Augusta. (Getty Images).

The decision late last year by Augusta National to break with tradition and allow its first ever female members has been widely applauded with the general consensus being " about time too!"

Current world No.1 Tiger Woods described the news as "fantastic" while three-time Masters champion Phil Mickelson said Condoleezza Rice is one of his favourite people to spend time with.

"Lefty" even played an Augusta practice round with the former U-S Secretary of State who impressed all watching by reportedly sinking a huge 40 foot putt on the very last hole!

Rice - along with South Carolina financier Darla Moore - remain the only female members at the private Augusta National Golf Club - as far as we're aware - and ahead of this year's Masters, club chairman Billy Payne described their joining as a joyous occasion adding "it's just awesome". He added he feels his club is a "beacon in the world of golf".

There's certainly no question that after years of intense focus on the club and its all-male policies –the admittance of two women is very much a step in the right direction but is it enough and will it indeed trigger other iconic venues to see the light of the Augusta beacon and follow suit?

This year's British Open championship venue Muirfield in Scotland for example still doesn't allow women members.

At a packed media press conference on Wednesday I asked Chairman Payne if he felt other clubs should now follow Augusta's lead. He responded that any such move would have to be their own decision while Mickelson declared he doesn't get involved in the "politics" of the game.

Here at Augusta fans out on the course are known as patrons. In truth, while the majority do fully agree it's high time to move on and adapt to the times, I did find a couple of female voices united in their belief that membership issues are down to each individual club.

That said, it's certainly not going to change the growing pressure of that majority to change. In addition to Muirfield - the world governing body of the game outside the USA - The Royal and Ancient Golf Club at Saint Andrews - is also male only.

Since its beginning in 1754, it's simply never had a female member! After almost 260 years - and following the recent example of Augusta - is the time now right for us to even dare to dream of change?

Posted by ,
Filed under:  Golf
soundoff (4 Responses)
  1. Sandy

    Yes. It's time for change. Clubs tend to make their own calls though.

    April 14, 2013 at 2:38 pm | Reply
    • Maximus

      No. Isnt it perfectly fine to have all female clubs? Plenty exist in sports and personal activities. Boys night out. Girls night out. All is fine

      April 25, 2013 at 3:24 am | Reply
  2. caddie x

    Reblogged this on caddie x and commented:
    As much as I agree with equal opportunities, if Murfield did allow female members, would any woman really want to join a club full of men who don't want them?

    July 22, 2013 at 6:13 pm | Reply
  3. caddie x

    As much as I agree with equal opportunities, if Murfield did allow female members, would any woman really want to join a club full of men who don't want them?

    July 24, 2013 at 2:21 pm | Reply

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.