After copious amount of money running into hundreds of millions of pounds City managed to to get dumped out of the the FA Cup, Dumped out of the Carling Cup, Dumped out of the Champions League, and Dumped out of the Europa cup...
If Wigan FC had not had a late end of season injection of motivation and had beaten Manchester united then City would also have been dumped out of the Premiership race too.

Wigan were the key...They beat Manchester United and then went on to beat Arsenal which was key to their survival in the premiership.

City did not win it...Manchester United lost it...The celebrations at the end of season was for Mancini keeping his job and not for Manchester city winning the premiership.

FYI, As a result of City's owner's investment, we now have:-

1. The greatest commitment to youth policy and development in the league. It was pretty impressive before.

2. The best pitch in the PL – We won the award

3. The best match day fan experience in the PL – We won the award

4. The best community schemes in the PL – We won the awards

5. The best website in the PL – We won the award (in fact the best
in all UK sport)
... check it out at dubyadubyadubyadotemseeeffseedotcodotyoukay!)

6. The fastest growing revenues in the PL, despite having the cheapest tickets (by far) of the top clubs (Arsenal almost 4 x higher)

7. Best entertainment for ticket cost in the PL- We won the award

... I believe we have the best match day food too!

City scored the most goals and conceded the least in the PL this year.

City's points total would have won the PL in four out of the last 5 seasons.

Pretty much every neutral and respected football contributor have agreed that we've played the best, most entertaining football in the PL this year.

City outplayed United in both PL encounters, with a 7-1 aggregate.

City won the last 6 games of the season (as we did last year) – isn't this United's "squeaky bum" strength ?

City came back repeatedly to salvage wins & draws. United didn't manage it once all season.

City won zero games as a result of refereeing favours, but lost or drew
several as a result of incorrect decisions against us (eg. Sunderland, Chelsea away)

United vs. QPR – United get penalty & red card for their opposition for
a cheating dive from an offside Ashley Young. Several more spring to mind.

City's record against the top 6 teams reads 8 Wins 2 losses.

QPR abysmal vs. City??? United parked the bus at the Etihad, lost
and had zero shots on goal. QPR parked the bus, scored twice
and lost only in extra-time. Look how many QPR players threw themselves into attempted blocks & tackles for Aguero's winner – I counted at least 5, including Onouha's lunging foul at the last.
- think that puts the QPR 'gave up' conspiracy to bed.

Real Madrid have been the richest & most over-funded club since their inception as the kings team.

Man United won their first PL title with the most expensively assembled squad ever in English football history & still hold the record for most expensive teenager, defender & goalkeeper in the league (& 2 of those were over 8 years ago!!!).

United won their first ever English title, in 1909, as a result of their spending power, buying City's best players and top-scorer the previous year.

Wayne Rooney tries to quit United, gets biggest contract in PL history.

Tevez refuses to warm up, loses 10M pounds & is forced to apologise
to manager, team-mates & fans. Still plays big part in our successful run-in & wants to stay.

Balotelli, comes on plays positively, maturely & creatively & provides assist to winning goal. Committed to City.

What you got Pedro???

... thought not

First of all, the title is invalid, considering the fact that Man City slipped up FIRST. By your logic, the title should be "Did Man City allow Man United to have the chance to stay in the title race, before eventually winning it?" That sounds about right.

Second, you call QPR abysmal. That's funny. So if QPR are abysmal and they lost to City 2-3, what does that make United? You know United lost to city at OT 1-6, right? Not sure if you know that because if you did know that when you wrote this article, your same faulty logic would mean that QPR is actually better than United...since they played a better game than United played against City on BOTH occasions. QPR lost at home to City 2-3 as well, just so you know (not sure you were aware).

Summary:

QPR 4 – City 6 = -2
United 2 – City 7 = -5

So explain how QPR played better against City than United did? Surely an abysmal team can't do that Pedro! Your argument is invalid because teams matchup differently with each other. If you took that into consideration instead of quickly expressing your thoughtless, biased rant, you would've seen that.

Third, you say City should have been far more impressive than they were? What does that even mean? How much more impressive would you like a team to be? Was 6-1 over the former EPL champions away from OT not impressive enough for you? How about the dominance in the return match? Or maybe you missed out on the 5-1 away win at Spurs? You state opinions but then you don't judge such biases on the same variables. It's shocking.

Fourth, glad you don't subscribe to the philosophy of buying success. That's good to know. So I guess then you don't subscribe to Man United either then? Since they bought their success back in 1987 in the early Fergie days? Which undoubtedly played a major role in United's future success? I'll let you Google that story on your own time.

Overall, the worst oppinionated article I have ever read.

@iameafra