Comments on: Is Chelsea's shock win sport's greatest upset?

By: nalyanaya daniel

nalyanaya daniel — Thu, 07 Jun 2012 15:11:00 +0000

yeh, the two bulls had one thing in common that's winning the game and this real shows that chelsea looked ahead to win and that was all.

By: Rockpdel

Rockpdel — Sat, 26 May 2012 16:53:39 +0000

May be all the Barca and Anti Chelsea fans should go to FIFA President and suggest him to change the rules of Football for good,,,
My point is, Barca is best football team in the world but everyone should know that Football match is won by the number of Goals but not number of passes,,,,,.
And also in that case we might as well get rid of the Football Posts,and rename the FOOTBALL as a whole , as everyone was having a cry about Barca had so much of the possessions while the result still went in favour of Chelsea.
In my opinion every competition has these two sides,
Offensive or Defensive,, and it is upto the Manager what he /she uses to get the result in favour of his/her team....
This time Di Matteo seemed to be cleverer that Pep,,,
hail for Chelses
offcourse a Chelsea fan..

By: savey

savey — Wed, 23 May 2012 18:40:17 +0000

I THINK THE BEST TEAM HAS DETERMINATION AND CAN DO ALL BEST THINGS TO WIN, BUT WITHOUT CHEATING. CHELSEA WON RIGHTLY BECAUSE OF SINCERE FOCUS AND SHEAR DETERMINATION. GOOD FOOTBALL.

By: Futbalfan

Futbalfan — Mon, 21 May 2012 19:24:29 +0000

I am just wondering... if football is played like ice hockey, as in NHL, requiring best of 7 to decide on the winner, or best of 5, instead of a do-or-die one game deal, would the result be different? Hmmm...

By: Deepak

Deepak — Mon, 21 May 2012 15:16:33 +0000

Alex Thomas , you wrote this article blaming the best sport in the world. Chelsea win seems fixed to you...but when they were struggling with their performance what about that isn't it fixed...3 years back Man city was struggling and Man United were best..this year they are champions coz they invested so much money collecting the best players...why do you think if some team is coming up against these top teams and beating them to the ground then its fixed....I THINK UR ARTICLE IS THE GREATEST UPSET EVER IN FOOTBALL NEWS COVERAGE.

By: Mungano

Mungano — Mon, 21 May 2012 09:27:23 +0000

It is a simple formula. Two fighters, one knows only how to attack but did not know how to defend himself when he is attached. The other one knows that the opponents is stronger than him but he well know how to defend himself and when opportunity presents itself, he can attack. That is what happened. Chelsea knows how to defend very well and knows how to attack and they applied the formula which made them won.

For those who have been saying all the crabs against Chelsea, let them remember that Barcelona have never beat Chelsea hands down. Chelsea is the only club in the world that gave Barcelona hard time whenever they meet. There is no doubt about that one.

By: john newman

john newman — Mon, 21 May 2012 07:46:24 +0000

the best is the team that overcomes setbacks within official play time to win a match

By: Saby

Saby — Sun, 20 May 2012 11:18:03 +0000

Chelsea were disciplined, motivated and above all... extremely lucky..

They were NOT the better team!

Barca was a better team. So were Real Madrid and Bayern. But did Chelsea deserve to win? Yes they did.. Its football.

By: Saby

Saby — Sat, 19 May 2012 22:52:33 +0000

greatest upset?Champions League final liverpool vs AC Milan, the first one. from 3 – 0 down to winning the game, that is an upset and a half!

By: Edvin Ramini

Edvin Ramini — Sat, 19 May 2012 17:47:06 +0000

shock or not shock, why not simply put as Chelsea was the better one
and that they are simply the best in europe
Messi is the best yes but football is not a one man war, its a team in which the coach is main leader and de Matio is one of the brains in football, only he is not paid as good as many but does it mean he is not better?
Chelsea is a good team and this game was an example of a TEAM work:))))) like or not:)))))